Air Traffic Controllers - FAA Talks Dispute Future Airspace Safety

In August 1981, 11,500 air traffic controllers whotravel within the U.S. airspace system. According to
belonged to the Professional Air Traffic Controllersthe FAA administrator's fact book for March 2005, in
Organization, known as PATCO, were permanently2004 air traffic in the national airspace system
fired by President Ronald Reagan, two days afterincluded over 46 million flights and 647 million
their strike began, due to their violation of federaltravelers. That translates into as many as 7,000
law. The president felt that the union did notaircraft, including commercial and military, all flying at
seriously consider the 'no-strike' provision of theirany one time. Given those numbers, the number of
contract and had no other choice, in order to avoid aincidents including accidents and fatalities are very
disastrous disruption in United States airspace.few, and both figure into the arguments of both
PATCO workers were then replaced withnegotiating sides.
non-unionized employees. Further to the firing,According to NATCA the dependability of the
President Reagan through an Executive Order insystem is crucial to the number of workers in
1982, prevented any of the fired air traffic controllersaddition to restricting the amount of overtime
from being rehired in the future by the Federalnecessary to keep the air traffic control towers,
Aviation Agency (FAA), which oversees U.S. airTerminal Radar Approach Control facilities, Air Route
traffic control. Over the next 3-4 year period newTraffic Control Centers and the Air Traffic Control
controllers were hired and trained in order to replaceSystem Command Center all functioning smoothly.
those fired, provided with supplementation by theAnd by virtue of the success of the system, the
U.S. military, in order to keep planes in the air. In 1993,FAA says the needs are not as dire as depicted by
also by Executive Order, President Bill Clintonthe union.
rescinded Reagan's Order, allowing previously firedYet, aviation safety investigators for the National
PATCO workers to be hired again by the FAA, whichTransportation Safety Board (NTSB) found as of
presently includes several hundred of the previouslySeptember 30, 2005, 324 incursions, or near misses,
dismissed.involving various types of aircraft including three near
Now, nearly 25 years later, the newly named airmisses of commercial jet liners in the past six months
traffic controllers union, National Air Traffic Controllersin Boston, New York and Las Vegas. The most
Association (NATCA), is in prolonged contractrecent incident involved US Airways and Comair
negotiations once again with the FAA, which beganflights on November 9, 2005 in which the US Airways
July 13, 2005. The present contract, which expired injet aborted its landing at the last possible second
2003 was extended until September 30, 2005, withwhen approaching Ft. Lauderdale's airport, missing the
salaries frozen and benefits continued until new termsComair jet by a mere 100 feet.
were met. As of September 30, 2005, the contractA new software program for runway surveillance has
has expired but continues under an "evergreenbeen pressed for by the NTSB for all major airports
clause," allowing for the original contract to remain infor several years. Presently, nearly all major airports
effect as long as talks continue. Similarly to theuse the Airport Movement Area Safety System
negotiations which led to the 1981 strike are the(AMASS) which routinely fails or has limitations during
issues of increased salaries and reduced workingperiods of precipitation. The Airport Surface
hours. But more differences than similarities exist inDetection Equipment-X system uses additional
the present talks.sensors to complement radar detection, and
Since the last agreement was negotiated in 1998,compensates for deficiencies in radar-only surface
NATCA members are working longer hours and havesurveillance systems as is AMASS. In addition,
more security responsibilities in the wake ofASDE-X is less sensitive to precipitation. However,
September 11, 2001. In addition, after the initial tailingmissing from both systems is a direct warning
off of air travel at the end of 2001 and the beginningsystem, meaning it requires the information be
of 2002, there are now more flights in the air at anydispatched to air traffic controllers to then be relayed
one time in the history of aviation travel, but withto flight crews on the runway. Thus, a matter of a
fewer controllers watching over more airplanes in thefew seconds could be crucial in matters of near
U.S., which has the world's busiest airspace. However,misses when planes are taking off and landing within
in the last two years, the FAA has lost 1,000seconds of each other. Nevertheless, the equipping
controllers.of the ASDE-X systems exists at only 16 major
But at the crux of the problem is that many of theairports with only additional select airports to be
controllers today are those who were hired in theprovided with the ASDE-X system by 2011, according
early 1980's and are set for retirement eitherto the FAA.
immediately or in the near future. There is a federalBut with labor costs accounting for 80% of the
mandate which requires all controllers to retire at ageFAA's $8.2 billion operating budget, the FAA's first
56 whether or not there are employees to replacepriority is the freezing of controllers' salaries with
them. The FAA admits that 2,580 controllers are setmerit-based pay raises replacing cost-of-living
to retire between 2005 and 2007 while only hiring anincreases. The current air traffic controllers' average
additional 13 in 2004. Additionally, there are notsalary is $128,000, excluding benefits and overtime
enough replacements in waiting in order fill the quota.pay. NATCA has supposedly asked for a 5.6 % pay
Instead of the originally promised 1,248 hires forincrease each year over the next five years,
Fiscal Year 2006, the FAA will now only hire 595 andalthough the union has publicly disputed such figures.
phase in the remaining 654, by replacing one retireeRegardless of the figures, however, the union also is
at a time.under the gun, much like unions in the private sector
With 9,000 of its 14,500 current number of air trafficthese days, with threats of outsourcing by the FAA,
controllers having been hired in the early 1980's, theshould negotiations fail. In addition, should both sides
FAA has dragged its heels on implementing areach an impasse as declared by a federal mediator,
replenishment system known about for years. In awhich the FAA has already called for, the FAA gets
Government Accountability Office report issued incloser to calling upon the Congress for a review of
June 2002, it stated that "The FAA has not doneits proposal. Should the Congress fail to act on its
enough to plan for the impending staffing crisis andproposal within 60 days thereafter, then the FAA
needs to do so as soon as possible. It has notcould unilaterally impose its contract upon NATCA.
developed such a comprehensive workforce strategyAnd while there are many concerns remaining
to address all of the challenges it faces in respondingregarding air travel security, such as the lack of
to its impending need for thousands of new air trafficinspection of cargo on commercial airliners, it is hard
controllers, thus increasing the risk that the FAA willto argue that it is crucial for the FAA to implement a
not have enough qualified controllers when necessaryprogram that both maintains and improves airspace
to meet air traffic demands." Sadly, the FAA tooksafety, which includes both personnel and
two more years to acknowledge their shortcomingsinfrastructure needs. Regardless of the negotiations
regarding staffing needs, publishing a similar report ofand political posturing by both the FAA and NATCA it
their own in 2004, but has recently promised to addwould serve them both well to stay on point during
12,500 controllers over the next ten years.deliberations in order to remain on the key issues,
The FAA is an agency under the jurisdiction of thekeeping in mind the welfare of the flying public as
Department of Transportation (DOT), whose centralwell as the national security of the U.S., which
responsibility is to ensure the safe and efficient airessentially should be their main mission.